Solutions that don’t break the bank, reinvent the wheel or marginalize our teachers are within our grasp. We could have rigorous classes, safe and disciplined schools and treat teachers like valued colleagues rather than easily replaceable cogs, and we could do so tomorrow if we wanted. Disclaimer, this is an opinion and commentary site and should not be confused as a news site, and you should know that quite often people may disagree with the opinions posted herein.
Search This Blog
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Romney doubles down on attacking teachers.
From the NEA, by Félix Pérez
Hearing Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney repeat yet again his claim that class size does not matter, voters might be tempted to quote a former president who famously said, “There you go again!”
Romney reiterated his class size mantra yesterday at an appearance at the Education Nation Summit hosted by NBC News. The former Massachusetts governor’s pronouncement that class size does not play a role in student achievement flies in the face of decades of research and the first-hand knowledge of educators and parents.
Dennis Van Roekel, a longtime high school math teacher from Arizona with more than two decades of classroom experience, said Romney’s remarks indicatehe is “oblivious to what is good for our nation’s students.”Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association, which represents more than 3 million educators, said:Referencing a single report from his tenure as governor, Romney said, “. . . within the normal range that exists in schools, it wasn’t classroom size that was driving [student achievement]. Nor was it spending per student.”
Romney . . . proved he’s completely out of touch with parents and educators. He continues to insist that class size doesn’t matter.
Doubling down on his campaign rhetoric of vilifying educator unions, Romney suggested limiting educator involvement in the political process. “I don’t mean to be terribly partisan, but . . . I think we’ve got to get the money out of the teachers’ unions going into campaigns.”
In response, Van Roekel said, “Attacking educators and unions like NEA with gross exaggerations about political muscle and with divide-and-conquer tactics is a distraction from having to confront the real questions about his education record as governor of Massachusetts.”
Romney’s reflexive antagonism toward educator-led unions came to the fore at the Education Nation forum when he cut off a New York City parent mid-question (view video clip below). Upon hearing the father cite a poll that found that New York parents support educator unions, Romney interrupted the audience member.
“I don’t believe . . . I don’t believe it for a minute . . . And I do know this, that having looked at schools, I know that the teachers’ union has a responsibility to care for the interests of the teachers.”
Calling Romney’s behavior toward the parent disrespectful, Van Roekel said, “Romney says he fundamentally believes in parental involvement, but when a New York City parent tried to say that in fact, recent polling shows that parents across the city of one of the nation’s largest public school systems, support teachers and their unions by a ratio of 3 to 1, Romney rudely cut him off, refusing to listen to facts. This was a disrespectful act unbecoming of someone seeking the highest office in the land. Parents deserve more respect.”