Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Trey Czar of the JPEF pads resume and bashes teachers

In the Times Union today when talking about teacher evaluations, he said, “as a former principal, it is a real learning experience for us.

The thing is Mr. Czar was never a principal, he was a vice principal (after just two years of Teach for America experience my bet that happened at a KIPP school) for two years at a KIPP charter school in New Orleans. Why did he pad his resume, well saying he was a principal gives him the appearance of legitimacy because if anybody knew his actual education experience they probably wouldn’t give his opinion the time of day.

His point then was as dubious as his resume. He said we need to figure out how to make evaluations qualitative data, the observation, match up with the quantitative data, the test score results. I guess he can’t fathom how teachers can get good evaluations at schools that do poorly on standardized tests.

The thing is most of these teachers are amazing, their students come from broken homes or ones wracked with poverty, they are often hungry and have safety issues. Some come from families that don’t value education or who have to concentrate all their energies just to keep the lights on or food on the table.

Instead of trying to figure out why their observations don’t match up with test scores, Trey Czar and the rest of us should get down on our knees and thank them because their students would undoubtedly be a lot worse off with out them.   

To see Czar’s resume, click the link: http://www.jaxpef.org/about-us/staff-directory.aspx

And in case the link doesn't work, here it is: Trey Csar has been the President of the Jacksonville Public Education Fund since May 2009. Before coming to the Jacksonville Public Education Fund, Trey worked as a youth organizer in San Francisco, working to involve students throughout California in advocating for better educational opportunities for their fellow students. He taught in an inner-city elementary school in Houston with Teach For America and served as an assistant principal at KIPP New Orleans West (NOW), a school set up in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina to work with low-income students who evacuated to Houston from the New Orleans area. Trey has a master's degree in education policy from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and bachelor's degrees from theUniversity of Florida in Journalism and Business Administration.

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Charter schools students returning to public schools in droves.

Via Facebook, from a reader

The Charter school kids are back. And they're back without money. The Charter schools they were in have cashed the checks from the State for pupil funding and are now cutting students loose to return to the public schools. 

The Charter students leave for any number of reasons, strict discipline, tough academic standards, dress codes, etc. About midway through the year they show back up at their neighborhood public school and we have to take them in without funding. No way to buy more textbooks or hire more teachers. 

Our class sizes are ballooning. And we have to State test them and it counts towards our salaries and professional evaluation regardless of what went on in Charter World. 

Rule of thumb - For every inner city student you have over the number of 20 you lose 10% effectiveness as a teacher. At 30 inner city students a teacher is at 0% effectiveness and at that point they're just doing teenage day care for the parents of Jacksonville. 

I just peeked into Guidance and the returning Charter kids are stacked up like aircraft in a holding pattern over Kennedy International with a wreck on the runway. And I'm the fire brigade. For another month anyways.

Charter School advocates want zero restrictions.

Sen. Jeff Clemens, D-Lake Worth, filed senate bill 452 last week which would require charter schools to meet a specific instructional need that local district schools can’t in order to obtain approval.

 “I think charter schools are there to serve the needs that the (traditional) public school system can’t,’’ Clemens told The Florida Current. “If they’re just going to do the same thing that we’re doing in public schools then I think it is a poor use of our tax resources.’’

Seems pretty reasonable to me seeing how hundreds of Charter schools have opened and close in Florida including about a half dozen since this school year began and districts often complain charter schools both lack innovation (the whole premise behind charter schools) and often run counter to their strategic plans. In my home town an under enrolled high school now has two new charter high schools within three miles of it.  

And despite all this, not surprisingly asking for reasonable restrictions has charter school supports in a tizy.

From Redefined Ed: Not surprisingly, his bill drew criticism from charter school supporters, including Jim Horne, a former Florida legislator and education commissioner who lobbies for Charter Schools USA.
“It is interesting now after 18 years of Florida charter schools when we have statistical data that clearly shows that Florida charter schools are outperforming district managed schools in most grade levels and gaining increasing market share that suddenly we see legislation that is aimed at severely limiting the growth of charter schools,’’ Horne said in an email. “In other words, if you can’t compete with them then let’s just stop them from opening in the first place.”


Where do I start, well first there is no clear statistical data that says charters as a group, despite numerous advantages, are performing any better, though with almost 250 having closed over the years you would expect the group to improve somewhat. Then just yesterday Doug Tuthill from step up for Students the group that is paid millions in public money to manage Florida’s voucher program that districts should not compete with charter schools and vouchers. Most charter school advocates aren’t interested in playing fair nor are they interested in doing what’s best for children. They just want to see them spread unchecked and damn the consequences.I wonder if there were any restriction despite repeated failure they would find reasonable.

I am not a charter school guy but even I think they have a limited role to replace as a supplement to our public schools, not the replacements for that many who by the way are also profiting off of them think they should be. Furthermore there are so many bad Charter schools that the entire industry gets one black eye after another when they close or continuously do poorly. Even charter school advocates should want reasonable restrictions because they protect the good charter schools from the cadre of people operating them just to make a buck.

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

What other profession allows me to make $37,000 a year after 14 years of experience while Ed Reformers tell me how greedy I am?

From the Huffington Post, by Randy Turner

Nothing I have ever done has brought me as much joy as I have received from teaching children how to write the past 14 years. Helping young writers grow and mature has been richly rewarding and I would not trade my experiences for anything.
That being said, if I were 18 years old and deciding how I want to spend my adult years, the last thing I would want to become is a classroom teacher.
Classroom teachers, especially those who are just out of college and entering the profession, are more stressed and less valued than at any previous time in our history.
They have to listen to a long list of politicians who belittle their ability, blame them for every student whose grades do not reach arbitrary standards, and want to take away every fringe benefit they have -- everything from the possibility of achieving tenure to receiving a decent pension.
Young teachers from across the United States have told me they no longer have the ability to properly manage classrooms, not because of lack of training, not because of lack of ability, not because of lack of desire, but because of upper administration decisions to reduce statistics on classroom referrals and in-school and out-of-school suspensions. As any classroom teacher can tell you, when the students know there will be no repercussions for their actions, there will be no change in their behavior. When there is no change in their behavior, other students will have a more difficult time learning.
Teachers are being told over and over again that their job is not to teach, but to guide students to learning on their own. While I am fully in favor of students taking control of their learning, I also remember a long list of teachers whose knowledge and experience helped me to become a better student and a better person. They encouraged me to learn on my own, and I did, but they also taught me many things. In these days when virtual learning is being force-fed to public schools by those who will financially benefit, the classroom teacher is being increasingly devalued. The concept being pushed upon us is not of a teacher teaching, but one of who babysits while the thoroughly engaged students magically learn on their own.
During the coming week in Missouri, the House of Representatives will vote on a bill which would eliminate teacher tenure, tie 33 percent of our pay to standardized test scores (and a lesser, unspecified percentage for those who teach untested subjects) and permit such innovations as "student surveys" to become a part of the evaluation process.
Each year, I allow my students to critique me and offer suggestions for my class. I learn a lot from those evaluations and have implemented some of the suggestions the students have made. But there is no way that eighth graders' opinions should be a part of deciding whether I continue to be employed.
The Missouri House recently passed a budget that included $2.5 million to put Teach for America instructors in our urban schools. The legislature also recently acted to extend the use of ABCTE (American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence), a program that allows people to switch careers and become teachers without having to go through required teaching courses.
It is hard to get past the message being sent that our teachers are not good enough so we have to go outside to find new ones.
And of course to go along with all of these slaps in the face to classroom teachers, the move toward merit pay continues. Merit pay and eliminating teacher tenure, while turning teachers into at-will employees are the biggest disservice our leaders can do to students. How many good classroom teachers will no longer be in the classroom because they question decisions by ham handed administrators looking to quickly make a name for themselves by implementing shortsighted procedures that might look good on resumes, but will have a negative impact on student learning.
If you don't believe this kind of thing will happen, take a look at what has occurred in our nation's public schools since the advent of No Child Left Behind. Everything that is not math or reading has been de-emphasized. The teaching of history, civics, geography, and the arts have shrunk to almost nothing in some schools, or are made to serve the tested areas. Elementary children have limited recess time so more time can be squeezed in for math and reading.
Even worse, in some schools weeks of valuable classroom time are wasted giving practice standardized tests (and tests to practice for the practice standardized tests) so obsessive administrators can track how the students are doing. In many school districts across the nation, teachers have told me, curriculum is being based on these practice standardized tests.
That devaluation and de-emphasis of classroom teachers will grow under Common Core Standards. Pearson, the company that has received the contract to create the tests, has a full series of practice tests, while other companies like McGraw-Hill with its Acuity division, are already changing gears from offering practice materials for state tests to providing comprehensive materials for Common Core.
Why would anyone willingly sign up for this madness?
As a reporter who covered education for more than two decades, and as a teacher who has been in the classroom for the past 14 years, I cannot remember a time when the classrooms have been filled with bad teachers. The poor teachers almost never lasted long enough to receive tenure. Whether it is was because they could not maintain control over their classrooms or because they did not have sufficient command over their subject matter, they soon found it wise to find another line of work.
Yes, there are exceptions -- people who slipped through the cracks, and gained tenure, but there is nothing to stop administrators from removing those teachers. All tenure does is to provide teachers with the right to a hearing. It does not guarantee their jobs.
Times have changed. I have watched over the past few years as wonderfully gifted young teachers have left the classroom, feeling they do not have support and that things are not going to get any better.
In the past, these are the teachers who stayed, earned tenure, and built the solid framework that has served their communities and our nation well.
That framework is being torn down, oftentimes by politicians who would never dream of sending their own children to the kind of schools they are mandating for others.
Despite all of the attacks on the teachers, I am continually amazed at the high quality of the young people who are entering the profession. It is hard to kill idealism, no matter how much our leaders (in both parties) try.
I suppose I am just kidding myself about encouraging young people to enter some other profession, any other profession, besides teaching.
After all, what other profession would allow me to make $37,000 a year after 14 years of experience and have people tell me how greedy I am?

The Florida Legislature puts teachers through hell for what reason?

The narrative they were selling was vast amounts of teachers interested just in Cadillac benefits and summers off were failing our kids and something had to be done. So they passed the odious and poorly named student success act so they could find out exactly which teachers and there were bound to be a bunch, they needed to get rid of. I am sure John Thrasher, Steve Wise and others envisioned long lines heading down to the state's unemployment offices.  

Well it turns out like with merit pay, vouchers, charters, blaming unions and just about everything else that has come out of Tallahassee in the last decade they were wrong once again.  

From the Tampa Times:  For the 2012/13 school year, 97.9 percent of teachers who were evaluated statewide were in the top two categories, effective and highly effective. Less than 1 percent of teachers - or 306 - fell into the lowest category, unsatisfactory, according to initial results released Tuesday afternoon by the state Department of Education.


Teachers played by the rules the anti-teacher Florida Legislature put in place and still came out ahead. Now if only Tallahassee would get out of the way, then we would really see progress. 

School choice advocate likes competition; except when public schools compete against them.

Oy vey, form the “I can’t make this stuff up file” Doug Tuthill of step up for students, which makes millions in public money to manage Florida’s voucher program, wrote in a ReDefined Ed piece: This concern with market share (for public schools) is a logical response to the expanding array of schooling options now available to families, including low-income families. But I’m uncomfortable with school districts becoming businesses in a competitive market place.

I know this sounds counterintuitive, or even hypocritical, coming from the president of the country’s largest private school choice organization.


Um you think it sounds hypocritical??

That’s the thing with school choice defenders, they keep changing the narrative. They say vouchers and charter schools are here to save kids from failing public schools, what they don’t do any better and often do worse, what they meant to say was vouchers and charter schools are here to foster competition, what public schools are competing and bringing students back, well that’s not something they should be allowed to do.

I really wish one of these guys, Tuthill who has gotten rich off the school choice movement for example, would just say; hey I saw an opportunity to make a lot of money so I took it.   

Monday, December 2, 2013

Former Duval TOY Zachary Champagne takes his silver and endorses Common Core

I get it, I really do. You get a little notoriety, you see an opportunity to make a little more money, and you get to leave the classroom which friends is a lot tougher than Jeb Bush and his ilk would have you believe is, so you jump ship. What I don’t see however is endorsing something that you are trying to stay as far away from as possible. Why would he sentence teachers and kids to something he wants to have nothing to do with? Oh I know it's because after reading about his new job I get the funny feeling he is looking to profit off of common core. he has gone from being a teacher to being a mercenary. 

I don’t want to go line by line and debunk his letter in the Times Union though believe me I could, read it here: http://members.jacksonville.com/opinion/premium-opinion/2013-11-29/story/guest-column-defending-common-core-standards#comment-

So instead I will just give you the four biggest reasons I think common core will be more of the same at best, there has been a new cure all every years for as long as I can remember, or a disaster at worse.

Endorsing common core is to endorse the high stakes testing culture we have now. Somewhere along the way tests went from being a tool to see how kids were doing to the whole kit and caboodle. Common Core does nothing to eliminate or even tone down the testing which has sucked the joy out of learning and teaching for countless students and teachers.

The Cost, despite what Pam Stewart says common core is going to be expensive, estimates for Florida range from a couple hundred million into the billions. Now undoubtedly some of those costs will replace costs we otherwise would have incurred. Some of those costs that is and it should be a huge red flag that the powers that be are not trying to clarify the expenses.  Most of that money by the way will be diverted away from schools and classrooms.

Next it does not address the problem facing our schools which is poverty. When you factor out poverty our children zoom to the top of the international rankings. Common core does absolutely nothing to address poverty and until we do all common core does is throw money down a hole, sorry make that into the bank accounts of testing companies, who are the primary financial backers of people like Jeb Bush who support Common Core.

Finally if Jeb Bush is for it you should be against it. Everything he has supported from his A-F grading scale to charters and vouchers have done great harm to education. He is a flim flam man who sends his children to exclusive prep schools with small classes without high stakes tests while at the same time sentencing our children to schools he would never send his kids to. Furthermore since he was in charge of our education system for 8 years he in effect is saying, I got it wrong with the standards we had in place when I was in charge, I would like a do over, a very expensive do over that doesn’t address our problems (poverty) and allows my backers to get rich, sorry make that richer.

Common Core does absolutely nothing to address the problems in our schools and if Champagne were being honest or actually concerned with improving things instead of just fattening his bank account he would fight for real change not more of the same.

Florida private schools complain they aren’t getting enough public money.

I am just going to jump to it. Due to a change in the spending formula Florida is no longer paying for dual enrollment classes. This is short sited and we should want as many as many high school students as are able to take colleges classes.

You hear all the time Florida’s leaders complaining about how e don’t have enough college graduates but then they continually put obstacles in kids way, see what they are doing to bright futures and the pre paid college plan as well. This however is not that story.

ReDefined Ed, Jeb Bush’s pro-privatization blog ran an article describing what a hardship this change in spending was to private schools.

From Redefined Ed: Some Florida private schools face an unexpected dilemma this school year: Find extra dollars to pay for state college courses their high school students want to take – or deny them the option.

The problem stems from a new law requiring public school districts and individual private schools to cover tuition for students enrolled in the state’s popular dual enrollment program.

Though it’s unclear how many private school schools and students are affected, the change has left some schools curbing participation and others anxious about what they’ll do if local colleges, prompted by the new law, end up hiking charges.


Um, cry me a river. Private schools through vouchers have been siphoning money out of public schools coffers for years now and despite being sold as saviors have performed no better than their public school counterparts.  

Furthermore I don't care if many are non-profits and have thin margin lines. You know who else are non-profits and have thin margin lines? Public schools that is who.

Until private schools agree to have certified teachers, many do not, and have a universal measurement that can be compared to public schools, I wouldn't wish the FCAT on anybody, then I don't believe they should get a dime.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Apparently teachers were never the problem!

In 2012-13 Duval spent more than 1.2 million on failed A. P. tests

According to the Times Union:   The district says that in the 2012-13 school year, 21,404 of its students took AP exams and 6,192, or 28 percent, passed them. The district covers the cost of the tests at 61 bucks a pop and that means we spent 1,232,172 dollars on failed tests.

Now some kids are taking the tests thinking or hoping they will pass but thousands are taking the tests knowing they will fail.

In this time of limited resources aren't there better uses of the ones we have?

To read the Times Union piece click the link: