Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Monday, December 15, 2014

Florida's education train wreck!

From Facebook

"Schoolteachers in the audience and the administrators, please correct me if my perception is incorrect. But I think that what no one has mentioned in here today - We are engaged in the destruction of our talent pool in education. No teacher that I know of is going to want to continue to teach under these kinds of trying circumstances. They’re leaving like crazy. Understand this. They’re leaving like rats off a sinking ship. And they’re quality teachers. They have the intellect and the ability to move into the business world and make far more money than they’re making as teachers, under far less trying circumstances.
And not only that, but we’re poisoning the well. How many high school students do you know that are experiencing this train wreck and hearing all this stuff and seeing it first hand are going to want to go to college to become a teacher? It’s not going to happen. This is a mess and we need to stop it right now."
Sen. Allan Hays (FL - R)
Lake County Legislators Delegation - Dec 2, 2014

Sunday, December 14, 2014

Florida Voucher proponents plant fear, misinformation and acrimony

By Wayne Blanton
I am grateful to the South Florida Sun Sentinel for its insightful, balanced, and responsible editorial on Nov. 29, “Court Review of School Vouchers Long Overdue.” I found Doug Tuthill’s combative response to the editorial surprising since I invited Tuthill to meet with me, and we sat down together last week to discuss areas of potential agreement.
Although he has been president of Step Up for Students for many years, it appears he’s not well-informed about his own program. The only other explanation for the errors in his response to the editorial supporting legal review of the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship is he is on a mission to deceive the public.
The “massive expansion” he denies exists refers to a $72 million increase in the program’s funding limit in just the past year. Initially, the program had a $50 million funding limit intended to aid low-income families. Now, sitting on an exorbitant $358 million cap, the program has increased its eligibility ceiling to include families of four making up to approximately $62,000 per year. That doesn’t sound like “Florida’s poorest schoolchildren.”
And, in terms of saving the state money, apparently Tuthill is unaware of the Legislature’s own analysis showing that, if left unchecked, the program soon will create a financial deficit for the state.
Tuthill also claims voucher students are learning, but avoids the real question: What are they learning? It seems he doesn’t want the public to know the private schools participating in this voucher program do not have to be accredited, teachers do not have to be certified, textbooks do not have to be up-to-date, and curriculum does not have to be in line with Florida’s high state standards.
Further, since voucher students are not required to take Florida’s statewide, standardized assessments, there is absolutely no way to measure whether these voucher schools are providing the high quality education guaranteed by our state constitution.
Not content to defend his program with vague half-truths, Tuthill also chose to strike out blindly at his opponents with baseless accusations. The education leaders behind the lawsuit have historically fought for students’ rights and are in no way attempting to deny equal opportunity to low-income students. As elected constitutional officers, school board members are sworn to uphold the Florida Constitution and are obliged to question laws and regulations which may violate its provisions.
The plaintiffs in this case believe that, in addition to infringing upon the separation of church and state by allowing state funds to indirectly aid sectarian institutions — more than 70 percent of participating schools are religious — the Tax Credit Scholarship Program recruits vulnerable students and diverts state funding into a parallel system of private education that is devoid of public transparency.
Tuthill’s comments in response to the Sun Sentinel’s editorial have maligned and insulted those who have legitimate concerns about the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program and, worse, he has created panic and confusion for the students and families engaged in the program.
The Florida School Boards Association, Florida Education Association, Florida League of Women Voters, Florida PTA, NAACP and other backers of the lawsuit have asked the court to review the Tax Credit Scholarship Program to determine if it complies with the requirements of the Florida Constitution. If this voucher program is all Tuthill claims it to be, he should have no fear of a judicial review of the program to affirm its legitimacy.
Dr. Wayne Blanton is the executive director of the Florida School Boards Association. He can be reached at blanton@fsba.org.

Friday, December 12, 2014

UNF responds to questions about the JPEF/UNF survey.

First I would like to thank Micheal Binder of UNF for getting back to me. I asked him to respond to the piece about the UNF/JPEF public awareness poll.

Note: I sent him a rough draft version of below, and yes it might seem like everything I write is rough, the content though is the same just a little tightened up. Professor Binder's responses are in bold.

Usually these polls give confidence intervals, they say things like, we are 95 percent confident that the answers are within plus or minus 4 percentage points. It gives them some wiggle room in case something is totally wrong. 

The margin of error for the entire survey was 4.38 percentage points.  It's not "wiggle room", it is the statistics of the sampling procedure.

Well when reading the poll a couple questions jumped out at me.

Did you vote in the most recent election, 72 percent yes, 28 percent no.  Well according to the supervisor of elections a little less than fifty percent of people voted. That’s one of those questions people might be embarrassed to answer truthfully especially if they didn’t so I guess begrudgingly we can give this question a pass.   

 There's two pieces to this.  First, you are correct.  There is likely a social desirability bias upping the reported number of voters.  Second, there is also likely a little bit of a selection issue as well.  Folks that are more likely to vote are also more likely to pick up their phone and agree to take the survey.  These numbers aren't very different than any other survey you'll see. 

The next question was, are you in support of Common Core, it was worded awkwardly but that was the gist. 62.4 percent of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that common core was a good idea. Well if that’s the case then Jacksonville is one of the last bastions of Common Core support. A lot of polls have shown support for common core plummeting and even the ultra-pro-common core Education Next group reported support had dropped to 53 percent nationwide though it was much lower among teachers.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/08/19/poll-common-core-support-among-teachers-plummets-with-fewer-than-half-supporting-it/

Okay just a ten percent swing, outside the margin of error but hey maybe we love common core here. 

 My response to this is again two-fold.  It is possible that folks like common core more here than elsewhere, but I'd likely suggest another explanation.  Question wording in surveys matters, and it matters even more so when asking about issues that the adults aren't well versed in. Common Core is one of those issues people have limited information about.  People like being able to compare their students to other students, that described explained in our survey question.  I suspect if we simply said "common core" and didn't explain that is was comparative standards the support would have been markedly lower. 

The next question was about holding teachers and schools accountable based on standards. Nearly 62 percent of the people agreed that was a great or good idea. But the poll never asked the same question about holding them accountable based on high stakes testing, which is both more accurate about how things are done and has been a huge issue lately. There are question about the business community, non-profits and Alvin Brown but nothing on testing? The Mel Gibson Conspiracy Theory part of me thinks they didn’t want to know the answer because it would have been dreadful, but I will save that for the next question.   

The next question was about open enrollment, which asked if your child should be able to go to any school in any part of town. A whopping 77.1 percent of the people thought this was a great or good idea and I will admit it sounds very attractive, the problem is it falls apart when any critical thinking is applied, http://jaxkidsmatter.blogspot.com/2014/03/another-big-gamble-by-superintendent.html

but why this question? Where is the question about high stakes testing, teacher pay, charter schools, Teach for America, vouchers or a whole host of seemingly more important issues?

Nowhere to be found that’s where.

I believe it’s because the JPEF and district are setting us up for a spring push to start open enrollment in the 15-16 school year. The JPEF recently recommended it in their school choice study and now the district can go, hey remember that survey we did a couple months back? We’re just doing what the people want us to do. Which would be ironic because another question asked if the board listened to public opinion and 55 percent of the respondents said either no or hell no.  

That is interesting conjecture.  Those aren't questions or comments that I know the answer to.  As the the Faculty Director for the Public Opinion Research Laboratory at UNF, we worked with JPEF in constructing the survey, question wording and order of the questions.  The content they wanted to ask about had to be balanced against the amount of questions we can actually ask — the survey ran about 15 minutes as it was.  I would direct those questions to JPEF.

I could review/question about a half dozen more questions but I’m going to do just one more. When asked where money from a potential new tax should go to there were a whole host of options, improving technology which is the supers favorite and safety which I am sure is parents were the two most popular options, but an option that wasn’t offered was to spend the money on human capital.  How about higher salaries for teachers or heck just hiring more teachers to comply with the class size amendment, something open enrollment goes around. How about using it to hire art, music and P.E. teachers which is what Palm Beach does with it’s special tax. Nope hiring more or paying better the people doing the actual educating wasn’t even mentioned and I believe that’s because to the district and the JPEF, we’re after thoughts.

 Again, I would direct that question to JPEF.   I could venture guesses, none of which are as Machiavellian as you're implying, but they would simply be guesses. 

I am sure there are people at the UNF Public Opinion Research Laboratory who could explain why they asked this question and why they left one that out. I am sure they can explain why they worded questions the way they did too. The real problem however is the influence that came from who they were working with.

The JPEF board is made up of common core loving, charter school running, high stakes testing supporters and it would be beyond the pale to think the people paying the bills don’t have any influence. These are the same people that though the QEA has hijacked democracy which has partnered with UNF to run the new teacher residency program, which may or may not be unraveling as we speak. This morning’s piece on NPR was a little vague but did mention that 2 out of the 13 member first class didn’t survive the first semester.

I am a proud graduate of UNF but when I see this poll the best I can do is give a slight nod to its veracity while I question its independence and I can’t help but think that if they were left to their own devices the questions and results might be totally different and probably more honest too.  

I am unable to comment on any teacher residency program or "QEA", since I have no idea what that is.  All I can say is that the survey was conducted entirely within our facilities.  The only influence JPEF had was on putting together some question wording.  

We executed the survey and sent them the data without any interference or even a hint that they had any preference for what the results actually said. 

If you have any more technical survey questions I'd be happy to answer them for you. 

Mike 

Michael Binder, Ph.D.Assistant Professor, Political Science

To see the poll so you can make your own judgments click the link:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/249808748/2014-Annual-Education-Perceptions-Poll-Formatted-Final

How valid if the JPEF/UNF public education poll?

Usually these polls give confidence intervals, they say things like, we are 95 percent confident that the answers are within plus or minus 4 percentage points. It gives them some wiggle room in case something is totally wrong.

Well when reading the poll a couple questions jumped out at me.

Did you vote in the most recent election, 72 percent yes, 28 percent no.  Well according to the supervisor of elections a little less than fifty percent of people voted. That’s one of those questions people might be embarrassed to answer truthfully especially if they didn’t so I guess begrudgingly we can give this question a pass.   

The next question was, are you in support of Common Core, it was worded awkwardly but that was the gist. 62.4 percent of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that common core was a good idea. Well if that’s the case then Jacksonville is one of the last bastions of Common Core support. A lot of polls have shown support for common core plummeting and even the ultra-pro-common core Education Next group reported support had dropped to 53 percent nationwide though it was much lower among teachers.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/08/19/poll-common-core-support-among-teachers-plummets-with-fewer-than-half-supporting-it/

Okay just a ten percent swing, outside the margin of error but hey maybe we love common core here.

The next question was about holding teachers and schools accountable based on standards. Nearly 62 percent of the people agreed that was a great or good idea. But the poll never asked the same question about holding them accountable based on high stakes testing, which is both more accurate about how things are done and has been a huge issue lately. There are question about the business community, non-profits and Alvin Brown but nothing on testing? The Mel Gibson Conspiracy Theory part of me thinks they didn’t want to know the answer because it would have been dreadful, but I will save that for the next question.   

The next question was about open enrollment, which asked if your child should be able to go to any school in any part of town. A whopping 77.1 percent of the people thought this was a great or good idea and I will admit it sounds very attractive, the problem is it falls apart when any critical thinking is applied, http://jaxkidsmatter.blogspot.com/2014/03/another-big-gamble-by-superintendent.html

but why this question? Where is the question about high stakes testing, teacher pay, charter schools, Teach for America, vouchers or a whole host of seemingly more important issues?

Nowhere to be found that’s where.

I believe it’s because the JPEF and district are setting us up for a spring push to start open enrollment in the 15-16 school year. The JPEF recently recommended it in their school choice study and now the district can go, hey remember that survey we did a couple months back? We’re just doing what the people want us to do. Which would be ironic because another question asked if the board listened to public opinion and 55 percent of the respondents said either no or hell no.  

I could review/question about a half dozen more questions but I’m going to do just one more. When asked where money from a potential new tax should go to there were a whole host of options, improving technology which is the supers favorite and safety which I am sure is parents were the two most popular options, but an option that wasn’t offered was to spend the money on human capital.  How about higher salaries for teachers or heck just hiring more teachers to comply with the class size amendment, something open enrollment goes around. How about using it to hire art, music and P.E. teachers which is what Palm Beach does with it’s special tax. Nope hiring more or paying better the people doing the actual educating wasn’t even mentioned and I believe that’s because to the district and the JPEF, we’re after thoughts.

I am sure there are people at the UNF Public Opinion Research Laboratory who could explain why they asked this question and why they left one that out. I am sure they can explain why they worded questions the way they did too. The real problem however is the influence that came from who they were working with.

The JPEF board is made up of common core loving, charter school running, high stakes testing supporters and it would be beyond the pale to think the people paying the bills don’t have any influence. These are the same people that though the QEA has hijacked democracy which has partnered with UNF to run the new teacher residency program, which may or may not be unraveling as we speak. This morning’s piece on NPR was a little vague but did mention that 2 out of the 13 member first class didn’t survive the first semester.

I am a proud graduate of UNF but when I see this poll the best I can do is give a slight nod to its veracity while I question its independence and I can’t help but think that if they were left to their own devices the questions and results might be totally different and probably more honest too.  

To see the poll so you can make your own judgments click the link:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/249808748/2014-Annual-Education-Perceptions-Poll-Formatted-Final

Parents are the last people who should pick their children’s schools.

What happens when a parent picks a lemon for car? It can be inconvenient and expensive but usually manageable but what happens when a parent picks a lemon for a charter school? They are sold a bill of goods and the school does not deliver which is a real possibility in Florida as over 260 have opened and failed leaving communities and families in a lurch and of those that remain as a group they perform worse than their public school counterparts.

The same question can be asked about private schools that take vouchers. We have no idea how they are doing because the entire system is set up to resist accountability. Sure there may be good ones but there are definitely terrible ones too, terrible ones that parents for whatever reason picked to send their children too.

Then what if a parent has crazy ideas about religion, the government, homosexuals or minorities? Breaking that cycle becomes impossible if the child is attending a school which spouts the same ideas.What if they get bad information from a movement that wants to undercut and privatize public schools so they can profit off of them?

Picking a school isn’t like picking milk or even a car, we are talking about real setbacks that can hinder a child for life if the parent chooses wrong. Parents shouldn’t be required to make a decision that could handicap their children for a lifetime or be convinced to pick wrong as many charter schools and private schools are now advertising.

Instead parents should be able to depend on a system of high quality public schools that have the resources that they need to assure an excellent education. Something that has been made even more difficult as Florida has set up a parallel system of charters and vouchers that siphon resources away from public schools.

I am not saying parents shouldn’t be involved but often the same people that say parents should have more choices are also blaming them for problems with their children by not being involved. At the end of the day parents are being asked to make a decision that most do not have the right information to make, while school choice supporters hope, cross their fingers, that the free market works it out.

Dr. Raymond of the Stanford Credo Charter project recently said, I actually am kind of a pro-market kinda girl. But it doesn’t seem to work in a choice environment for education. I’ve studied competitive markets for much of my career. That’s my academic focus for my work. And (education) is the only industry/sector where the market mechanism just doesn’t work. I think it’s not helpful to expect parents to be the agents of quality assurance throughout the state. I think there are other supports that are needed… The policy environment really needs to focus on creating much more information and transparency about performance than we’ve had for the 20 years of the charter school movement. We need to have a greater degree of oversight of charter schools. But I also think we have to have some oversight of the overseers.

The pro-market reform Thomas B. Fordham Foundation paid for this study she was commenting on.
This isn’t to say choice shouldn’t have a role to play at all but it should come under the public school umbrella as they provide more and various magnet or industry certification programs so more kids’ abilities and interests can be served. Then if there is a specific program not being offered by a district we can look at vouchers and charters as they are used to supplement public schools not to replace and privatize them.

The answer is to fix the issues in our schools and to supply them with adequate resources, not to outsource our kids futures to maybes and possibilities.

Parents have a difficult enough job, let’s leave the educating to the professionals.

Superintendent Vitti is impressively bad

Well according to the districts logic he is in anyways.
A couple weeks ago after a one-two percent improvement of the Gallup poll on the wellness of 5th-12th grade students the district touted it as the best thing since sliced bread. They said this marginal and hard to quantify change was impressive.

Well let’s look at a recent survey question by the JPEF.

How is Superintendent of Duval County Public Schools, Dr. Nikolai Vitti doing?

Rating Last Year, This Year, percentage change
Very effective 12.7/14.9/2.2
Somewhat effective 37.7/36.6/ -1.1
Somewhat ineffective 11.7/ 12.9/ 1.2
Very ineffective 10.3/ 10.1/ -0.2
Don't know 25.1/22.8/ -2.3  
No answer 2.4/ 2.7/ 0.3
Total 100.0/ 100.0

I actually think the most telling statistic is that over a fifth of the city has no idea how he is doing. Spolier alert I think he has a big needs improvement, but his somewhat effectives slightly tumbled and his somewhat ineffectives nosed up and yes I see his very effectives went up too, probably explained by the survey talking to new charter school owners but my point is the absurdity of the district getting so excited about a one-two percent bump in the Gallup wellness study, and that absurdity is part of a new propaganda trend initiated by the district. See the Supers Times Union op-ed as example number one. http://jaxkidsmatter.blogspot.com/2014/12/vitti-saves-christmas-and-rest-of-us.html
 
I don’t know about you but I would rather have a district that was honest about our problems instead of trying to sugar coat them. The, its time the entire city rolled up its sleeves and got to work, message resonates a lot more with me than the misleading, all is well, message the district is trying to sell.

They need to and can do better.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Non-profit charter schools are really fronts for For-profit companies

Charter schools are supposed to be non-profits.

Lauren Roth wrote in the Orlando Sentinel: And they gave the go-ahead to Charter Schools USA to open two K-8 schools under the Renaissance Charter Schools name.


Then Sonja Isger wrote in the Palm Beach Post: Charter Schools USA, the company behind the Renaissance application, is bound to appeal the denial to the state. Officials at CSUSA are expected to call with a comment today.

CUSA isn't even really pretending anymore and it seems like lots of reporters know it. They also own a construction arm, Red Apple that buys property, builds buildings and then rents it back to CUSA which they pay for with the management fees from Renaissance their supposed non-profit and it's been reported that the rents are often above market value. 

Then they also donate to School Board members and legislators so they can get their way. Heck Renaissance and CUSA share the same office and law firm

The truth is Renaissance fronts for Charter schools USA and the people should know about it. People should know that charter schools really aren't non profits but are actually fronts for for profit companies. Pro Publica recently did a similar piece. 

Palm Beach says no to Charter Schools USA, why won't Jacksonville?

From the Palm Beach Post:

Charter denied.
What began with School Board member Frank Barbieri asking for a conversation about an application to build a seventh Renaissance Charter School in the district ended with the board unanimously denying the charter because by their measure the school was offering nothing “innovative” that the district’s schools don’t.
It was the first time the board took this line, denying a charter simply because they deemed it had nothing special to offer students.
Charter Schools USA, the company behind the Renaissance application, is bound to appeal the denial to the state. Officials at CSUSA are expected to call with a comment today.
Several board members on their way to re-election, including Debra Robinson and Marcia Andrews, said this fall that they appreciate the role some charter schools play, serving, for example,  populations such as severely autistic children, who don’t get complete service within district-run schools.
But they said they were fed up with approving schools that offer nothing special for children and, from their point of view, were built simply to compete for students and the dollars that come with them.
Wednesday at a board workshop, Barbieri echoed those concerns.
“When you have a brand new charter school being built next to an A-rated middle school like Emerald Cove that has no problem with the majority of students there… if we’re going to be in competition with charter schools, let’s level the playing field,” he said. “They have an unfair advantage… we have to take every child that walks in the door… until we have a level playing field, I’m not voting for a charter school like Renaissance that have no more objective than to make profit at the disadvantage of our children.”
The Duval County School Board could really learn a lesson from the Palm Beach school board.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Jacksonville one of the top ten cities for charter growth in the nation

Oy vey just skip to the link below to read the piece after you read why that is bad for all of us.

Charter schools siphon resources out of the district which leads to lower salaries for teachers and less resources for kids in public schools.

Charter schools pay their teachers less money which means they can't contribute as much to the local economy as public school teachers can.

Many are managed by for profit charter school companies that take the money out of the local economy, hey right wing republican guy, you might not like public schools but they spend local.

Here is a link to an article about it: http://www.propublica.org/article/when-charter-schools-are-nonprofit-in-name-only

Now maybe all of above would be acceptable if they did better job educating our children, but they don't. they do worse far worse. http://contextflorida.com/julie-delegal-charter-school-grades-alarm-every-floridian/

We have more charter schools than most districts have schools. the amount of charter schools here in Jacksonville have increased nearly 400 percent from 9 to 35 in the last four years.  Its a disaster that hurts, our community, teachers and worst of all our students.

We can't even say enough is enough, because if we want to see our school system improve we need to get rid of most of the ones that we have.

Here's the link http://www.redefinedonline.org/2014/12/report-puts-florida-charter-school-growth-perspective/

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Florida's Class Size Amendment: A Case Study in How to Undermine the Will of the Voter

From Kafka Teach.wordpress.com

If you are a teacher in Florida, you may be wondering “Hey, what happened to the class size amendment this year?” Of course, you would have to be a teacher who was lucky enough to teach one of the 327 (out of 1200) courses still covered by the class size amendment. It seems every year since the Florida Class Size amendment was passed (twice), the Florida legislature has found a way to reduce the amount of courses that fall under the class size cap. In 2012, Advanced Placement teachers got a taste of what it’s like to be a PE teacher when AP classes were declared “electives” and AP class sizes ballooned to over 40 students. But now even teachers in core classes  have noticed that the class size amendment has seemingly disappeared this year. At my school we’ve been scratching our heads at Curricululm Council meetings trying to figure out why the district hasn’t released any additional funds to hire new teachers when we have 40 core classes of over 40 students each. After a few minutes of playing Google detective, I happened upon the answer to the riddle that has been befuddling teachers across the state,
A little known bill was passed last summer that now allows school districts that don’t meet class size caps to calculate class size based on school wide averages rather than the size of the individual class, thus greatly reducing the fine (by approximately 3/4) that school districts have to pay the state for being out of compliance. Here is some of the language of the bill:
The bill revises the method for calculating the penalty for traditional public schools that fail to comply with the class size requirements by performing the calculation in Steps 2, 3, and 4 at the school average instead of at the classroom level. The increase in the penalty scheduled to begin in FY 2014-15 and thereafter is repealed. School districts must continue to assign students to teachers in a manner that meets the classroom level maximums. Districts that exceed the classroom level maximums will still be required to implement a compliance plan. However, calculation of the penalty at the school average will reduce the monetary penalties levied against school districts.
The bill does not have a fiscal impact on state government. The bill’s changes to the compliance calculation for traditional public schools will likely have a positive fiscal impact on school districts. See Fiscal Impact on Local Governments.
The bill takes effect July 1, 2014.”
Not only does the state get away with not funding the class size amendment, but it actually makes money off of school districts who do not comply by imposing fines! Of course, this makes school districts hate the class size amendment as much as the Florida legislature and last summer our Superintendent of the Year made sure to hammer the final nail in the Florida class size amendment coffin by making sure the fine was reduced and school averages could be used for traditional public schools, (see list of 2014 Legislative priorities)
There seems to be great agreement among school district officials that small classes hurt students.
Miami-Dade Assistant Superintendent Iraida Mendez-Cartaya spoke in support of the proposal. Mendez-Cartaya said complying with class-size limits was “not always in the best interest of family and students.”
In Brevard County, Cyndi Van Meter, Brevard’s associate superintendent of curriculum and instruction was quoted as saying,
“It wasn’t all about the money,” Van Meter said. “It was about doing what was best for kids.”
Apparently, it has become quite the rage for district officials to claim that large class sizes are in the best interest of children. It’s funny how you can follow up any absurd statement with “It’s what’s best for kids” and nobody will question you. Beware, “It’s what’s best for kids”  is usually preceded by a statement which coincides with adults making a lot of money. Watch how it works.
  • “We need to put vending machines in schools that sell addictive crap food. It’s what’s best for kids.”
  • “We need to give every student an iPad and digital curriculum. It’s what’s best for kids.”
  • “We need longer, tougher, more frequent computer based high stakes testing. It’s what’s best for kids.”
See how easy it is! The district claims it has no money to meet the Florida class size amendment, but it had money to pay for a full day substitute for me to attend a PD telling me how teach the same way I’ve been teaching for the past ten years before it became packaged as a “history lab” or the “gradual release model.” They are taking teachers out of the classroom (teachers that could have been used to meet the class size compliance) and sending them around to schools across the district to terrorize other teachers into using group work. As one teacher with an inclusion class of 55 students pointed out at my PD session today, “You can’t put the kids in groups with 55 students in a room.” Amen sister.



http://kafkateach.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/the-florida-class-size-amendment-a-case-study-in-how-to-undermine-the-will-of-the-voter/